glungus
Checked, no markers foundWe watched this launch and checked it against every marker we record. None of them is present: the creator kept 9.9%, 675 outside wallets bought on the curve, the curve took longer than a minute to fill, and no single wallet took it. A statement about what we checked, not a judgement about the token.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-29 08:03 UTC |
| Creator | 14N7AjwsTkSd1DJGJMdWnjLLVofr1GDGe7v9hRSpPUYt |
| Creator took | 9.9% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 675 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 28 within the first 30s, 4 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 45 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | dXSndtmLVafBVszzDtz76i… slot 451,582,300
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-29 08:03:23 UTC Slot 451,582,300, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 4 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Thirty seconds in | 28 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-29 08:48:22 UTC +44m 59s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-29 08:48:22 UTC +44m 59s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 32 launches from 29 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 12 launches from 11 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This document | Byte-identical to 1 other launch's metadata document. See them → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 1 other creator wallet, across 2 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. Together they sit in a linked group of 2 creator wallets. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 58.2 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-29 13:22 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | glungus |
| Metadata held | sha256 0e8a4d7f2d24981937e3ae377ba93fe85d8c73f9455c1c18b59b500638d0c01f · 258 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 f41b52e49713a45b00f29649a59e3862c13b6297b23140dfbf7c41185bc29ec5 · 7,658 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-29 08:03 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.