XLiquid
Checked, no markers found; pool below threshold when last readWe watched this launch and checked it against every marker we record; none is present. Separately, the pool balance was below our threshold when it was last read - a present-tense measurement with its own age, stated below, and not part of the launch record.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
noteOnly 11.1 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-29 01:41 UTC |
| Creator | 84X8FoUHYmQqXnc3erBf1sruZBSHYFzu4KhKbkfyV6HQ |
| Creator took | 2.8% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 684 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 125 within the first 30s, 9 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 24 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | DGdwdFYYnKA5s7RpNuLJyD… slot 451,496,453
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-29 01:41:00 UTC Slot 451,496,453, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 9 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Thirty seconds in | 125 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-29 02:05:12 UTC +24m 12s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-29 02:05:12 UTC +24m 12s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 7 launches from 7 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This document | Byte-identical to 1 other launch's metadata document. See them → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 1 other creator wallet, across 3 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. The linkage sits in a component too large for this record to state as one group; the record states that exclusion. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 11.1 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-29 12:42 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | XLiquid |
| Metadata held | sha256 8d94f0d31006c55434d386128415b9d395be390fec831d33d60d9778f46242ff · 341 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 152ea546ee63077976e80bd75d987c8fb8ee8496f8b0656f37c78eed8a40c865 · 7,448 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-29 01:41 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.