COCKROACH
The curve completed 35s after launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
findingIt left the curve 35s after launch.
noteOnly 0.0 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-29 13:40 UTC |
| Creator | AJkG6jcj18e62BEWaqP7NWwEEvvDtB5gVHr7fATH9uz3 |
| Creator took | 11.6% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 106 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 106 within the first 30s, 4 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 1 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | M5Hrkek1Z9DcChnwPb3GEt… slot 451,657,969
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-29 13:40:03 UTC Slot 451,657,969, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 4 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-29 13:40:03 UTC
0.000e+0 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Thirty seconds in | 106 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-29 13:40:39 UTC +35s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 125 launches from 88 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This document | Byte-identical to 1 other launch's metadata document. See them → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 1 other creator wallet, across 2 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. The linkage sits in a component too large for this record to state as one group; the record states that exclusion. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 0.0 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-29 20:13 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | cockroach |
| Description | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-CRlTN55K4 |
| Metadata held | sha256 5a70a45c8555800f2f3cd75b245ffeee49f9efb8eb73f737ea2e8c2e2cfec446 · 360 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 f11f797745ab10e6a0f5f4db40d14375e6d141d14e398b9ef68ace94a66fc3cc · 18,520 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-29 13:40 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.