1,067,955 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 19:04 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Pro

stardih

No finding either wayWe watched this launch. It matches none of the patterns we record, and it does not meet every criterion for a record with no markers. Neither endorsed nor accused.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

GdjF8iV7BncBvvDihvcWpuaNFZ72VgdFvd7AzEcypump Solscan pump.fun
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 1.7 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.

At launch

Created2026-09-28 17:04 UTC
CreatorDvA8JkzPWMLB7e3gMy4nDyvs1yTsxuM74gjbZ6aY8z3i
Creator took4.1% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers617 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 103 within the first 30s, 10 bundled into the creation block.
Graduated4 min after launch
Curve, read on chainNot read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch.
Creator soldyes
Recorded from59fHRpkTbaC24smc5VYqtD… slot 451,380,783
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.

Order of events

Created2026-09-28 17:04:21 UTC
Slot 451,380,783, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation block10 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist.
Thirty seconds in103 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.
Curve completed2026-09-28 17:07:52 UTC +3m 32s
Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it.
Highest price seen2026-09-28 17:07:52 UTC +3m 32s
4.109e-7 SOL per token. Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This tickerOn 15 launches from 12 creator wallets, including this one. See them →
This documentByte-identical to 3 other launches' metadata document. See them →
Birth artifactsLaunches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 3 other creator wallets, across 2 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. Together they sit in a linked group of 4 creator wallets. See the linked wallets →

Pool

Liquidity1.7 SOL
Read from chain2026-09-29 21:44 UTC, just now

What this launch claimed to be

Namestardih
Metadata heldsha256 1f286ebe181cd24905fa103bef500a9b7151fd50866e90f96e4c0cf429cb6a90 · 316 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Document re-readByte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-29 17:06 UTC.
PictureNot captured, so we cannot show what it published. That is our storage budget, not a finding about the launch.

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-28 17:04 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another