e/NPC
The curve completed 14s after launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
findingIt left the curve 14s after launch.
noteOnly 2.2 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-30 13:40 UTC |
| Creator | EJVrsEvXc4H2E4KjuEmzJARGEYy2xSukF7XEt2UCLAJH |
| Creator took | 0.4% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 26 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 26 within the first 30s, 8 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 0 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 3cbiwkjgt4fitsvPvnnyvw… slot 451,980,822
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-30 13:40:37 UTC Slot 451,980,822, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 8 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-30 13:40:51 UTC +14s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-30 13:40:51 UTC +14s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Thirty seconds in | 26 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This document | Byte-identical to 1 other launch's metadata document. See them → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 1 other creator wallet, across 2 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. The linkage sits in a component too large for this record to state as one group; the record states that exclusion. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 2.2 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-30 20:20 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | NPCs Accelerationism |
| Description | The NPC has left the script. A community-powered experiment in moving the timeline forward. |
| Metadata held | sha256 27036a2adfc4cb13511636737bca054cfb6b5580ce1105ad8798399be8e3970b · 425 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 64db10473f05c637afd60cfd267a02041af17dee1058685253581bc70bbc2717 · 275,191 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-30 13:40 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.