lowkinuxd
No finding either wayWe watched this launch. It matches none of the patterns we record, and it does not meet every criterion for a record with no markers. Neither endorsed nor accused.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
noteOnly 0.4 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-10-01 12:52 UTC |
| Creator | 9ecRdqNCBxwReiY2pxtnLeayeBzE1CrSSmKKJJGdmsaJ |
| Creator took | 5.0% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 19 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 5 within the first 30s, 0 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 5 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 3YrFdZWC2v3hmG9WuJfyb7… slot 452,293,195
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-10-01 12:52:55 UTC Slot 452,293,195, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | No wallet bought in the block the token was created in. |
| Thirty seconds in | 5 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-10-01 12:53:30 UTC +36s
7.722e-8 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Curve completed | 2026-10-01 12:57:36 UTC +4m 41s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | No other launch we hold a picture for used this one. |
| This creator | 4 earlier launches, 1 confirmed graduated on chain. See the creator's launches → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 0.4 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-10-01 19:51 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | lowkeyinuween |
| Metadata held | sha256 bb6bc733c9152a80532a010155ff485e2ba0ff4ad2da7cc7f1c0e27e8b28db1d · 227 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 037203ad4ef57ebf08dcb9f9f12ef17373e2efbb8a067bba5d175bd2b66eac4e · 59,864 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-01 12:52 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.