Claimr
No finding either wayWe watched this launch. It matches none of the patterns we record, and it does not meet every criterion for a record with no markers. Neither endorsed nor accused.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-19 22:58 UTC |
| Creator | 6K75A96qP48KQMHin3N9LmJSqksB5hk8efBYABVyGJ64 |
| Creator took | 3.0% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 53 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 9 within the first 30s, 9 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 4 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | yes |
| Recorded from | 2gq8iBa71crHs3jfCooxUw… slot 448,549,221
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-19 22:58:44 UTC Slot 448,549,221, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 9 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Thirty seconds in | 9 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-19 23:02:19 UTC +3m 34s
3.944e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-19 23:02:36 UTC +3m 52s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 3 launches from 3 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 15 launches from 14 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This document | Byte-identical to 1 other launch's metadata document. See them → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 2 other creator wallets, across 3 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. Together they sit in a linked group of 4 creator wallets. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 181.8 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-20 06:13 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Claimr |
| Metadata held | sha256 749371c856d9c2d16382cc0a9fe7ef4b2227e7afd42b4ec027a53dc8f8357c35 · 262 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 1821fb837ff6cd27fa432e0c1895c8fe01e6ec3de689fc6c9f6c7111baca1edf · 1,492,037 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-19 22:58 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.