1,147,590 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 03:05 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Pro

DotDotDot

No finding either wayWe watched this launch. It matches none of the patterns we record, and it does not meet every criterion for a record with no markers. Neither endorsed nor accused.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

5FiaKoFpPD1L2kW1pYJhTBUsvgbSt2JWmzqjkbMpump Solscan pump.fun
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 1.1 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.

At launch

Created2026-09-29 23:09 UTC
CreatorC1TvzrNskGwyDKakNTWUHa2yRCeVQaLticUwLa954GpB
Creator took3.1% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers1,008 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 261 within the first 30s, 8 bundled into the creation block.
Graduated3 min after launch
Curve, read on chainNot read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch.
Creator soldyes
Recorded from45acRqerYEFL8jUtrdMjAZ… slot 451,785,121
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.

Order of events

Created2026-09-29 23:09:07 UTC
Slot 451,785,121, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation block8 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist.
Thirty seconds in261 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.
Curve completed2026-09-29 23:12:21 UTC +3m 14s
Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it.
Highest price seen2026-09-29 23:12:21 UTC +3m 14s
4.109e-7 SOL per token. Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This tickerOn 10 launches from 10 creator wallets, including this one. See them →
This documentByte-identical to 1 other launch's metadata document. See them →
Birth artifactsLaunches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 1 other creator wallet, across 2 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. Together they sit in a linked group of 2 creator wallets. See the linked wallets →

Pool

Liquidity1.1 SOL
Read from chain2026-10-01 07:31 UTC, just now

What this launch claimed to be

NameKing DotDotDot
Metadata heldsha256 ef0d2cca1b25a397c6bc5c6ac60557f34e4d111dba89915f734b5b173558e116 · 240 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Document re-readByte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-30 23:10 UTC.
PictureNot captured, so we cannot show what it published. That is our storage budget, not a finding about the launch.

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-29 23:09 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another