DUM
No finding either wayWe watched this launch. It matches none of the patterns we record, and it does not meet every criterion for a record with no markers. Neither endorsed nor accused.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 0.9 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-10-01 22:16 UTC |
| Creator | ACLX9j7QNyjupi3hq85tk96eBzbjJqDYod4pcq2BcDY |
| Creator took | 3.5% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 688 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 106 within the first 30s, 21 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 4 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not re-read, deliberately: the pool is the confirmation. Migration empties a completed curve into its pool, so the pool's existence - recorded on this page - proves what the curve account would. Curve reads are spent where no pool answers. |
| Creator sold | yes |
| Recorded from | 3VqmQ5UbS7N8viebKkDCPe… slot 452,419,137
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-10-01 22:16:37 UTC Slot 452,419,137, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 21 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Thirty seconds in | 106 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-10-01 22:20:35 UTC +3m 58s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-10-01 22:20:35 UTC +3m 58s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 6 launches from 6 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 35 launches from 29 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This document | Byte-identical to 4 other launches' metadata document. See them → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 5 other creator wallets, across 3 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. The linkage sits in a component too large for this record to state as one group; the record states that exclusion. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 0.9 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-10-02 03:51 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | dum |
| Metadata held | sha256 95969873b78e819192baa0d511acf67179de10b8addb7d87bd9a464bd9fce80e · 266 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 e866833d4ed86a53581bb6c59312f3e3284bd1820f3ee9d27f9f905a44ff9da9 · 13,234 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-01 22:16 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.