2,080,835 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 19:58 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Pro

KRAWD

No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

5gYtAc9xjJxUqFbgEAM2JMuyEDGaaYivupcU5Y1Qpump Solscan pump.fun

Cite this record as: Chain of Title, KRAWD (krawd), mint 5gYtAc9xjJxUqFbgEAM2JMuyEDGaaYivupcU5Y1Qpump, observed at creation 2026-10-18 14:24 UTC. Chain of Title, a register of Solana token launches recorded at creation. https://chainoftitle.org/t/5gYtAc9xjJxUqFbgEAM2JMuyEDGaaYivupcU5Y1Qpump

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 1.7 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.

At launch

Created2026-10-18 14:24 UTC
Creator3doTWaRpGmT2zeFzEeaLo7maLAgvW9hBdng3ZkuiGpSQ
Creator took3.4% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers622 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 77 within the first 30s, 14 in the very same block the token was created in - a block is one batch of transactions, so those buys and the creation were confirmed together.
Graduated18 min after launch
Curve on chainNot re-read, deliberately: the pool is the confirmation. Migration empties a completed curve into its pool, so the pool's existence - recorded on this page - proves what the curve account would. Curve reads are spent where no pool answers.
Creator soldyes
Recorded fromNATtYeTennD68uUy3QFVaa… slot 458,467,084
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.

Keep this launch as a document

A dated extract of this one launch, frozen at the moment you buy it: every other launch that carried the byte-identical picture or document, this creator's other launches, and what this register checked. A page you can send to someone, and a clean PDF from your browser's print dialogue.

No account needed; the link arrives by email and is permanent. It is this register's own output, with no signature and no attestation: the scoped, signed version written for a dispute is a provenance report. Everything on this page stays free.

Order of events

Created2026-10-18 14:24:52 UTC
Slot 458,467,084, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation block14 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist.
Thirty seconds in77 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.
Curve completed2026-10-18 14:42:59 UTC +18m 07s
Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it.
Highest price seen2026-10-18 14:42:59 UTC +18m 07s
4.109e-7 SOL per token. Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureNo other launch we hold a picture for used this one.
This tickerOn 3 launches from 3 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 87.7% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →

Pool

Liquidity1.7 SOL
Read from chain2026-10-18 23:02 UTC, just now

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
Namekrawd
DescriptionBuild your own web crawler. Send it out to research for you.
Metadata heldsha256 5e3fe16fa8c795c4199344f5483462ab2f6fd8370a711c3fa3997ba78e921fa5 · 351 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 d690c0dae63898b01f46a22d52e4273e589106adc7ae0c21365afcf51b1cd6e0 · 131,584 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-18 14:24 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another