3,480,180 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 16:55 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Brand Protection
The picture this launch published at birth

Launch record · observed at creation 2026-09-02 12:49 UTC

DOOYET

Doomed Yeti

5itvgkGrrkCSZMGEHZYxXmqb3kteVyQ39RAtYCRVpump Solscan pump.fun
0.3%of supply taken by the creator in the first block
0outside wallets bought on the bonding curve
Noreached a graduation threshold while we watched
4,108launches carry this ticker, from 1,156 creator wallets
3,632other launches declared this same launch document, byte for byte
4,291other launches used this exact picture file
No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 4,291 other launches from 1,168 creator wallets in all, and this creator has 279 other launches on record. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.2% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

noteThe creator sold while we were watching.

At launch

Created2026-09-02 12:49 UTC
Creator8eTxpWAn3DCz2AhtbBhkizYMt95Ab8bf14714Dvoison
Creator took0.3% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers0 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 6 within the first 30s, 1 in the very same block the token was created in - a block is one batch of transactions, so those buys and the creation were confirmed together.
Graduatednot while we were watching
Curve on chainNothing to confirm. This launch never reached a graduation threshold while we watched, so there was no completion to check against the curve account. Most tokens end this way, and it is not a finding about them.
Creator soldyes
Recorded fromNot recorded. This launch predates our keeping the creation transaction (2026-09-09), and its trade rows had been pruned by retention before the backfill could recover the signature from them. The figures above stand on our own observation alone, which is weaker than a citation, and we would rather say so than leave the gap unmarked.

Order of events

Created2026-09-02 12:49:41 UTC
Creation block1 wallet bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist.
Highest price seen2026-09-02 12:49:46 UTC +5s
3.408e-8 SOL per token. Source not recorded, which is every row written before 2026-09-10 - never that the peak was unsourced. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.
Thirty seconds in6 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureOn 4,272 launches from 1,168 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.2% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them →
This tickerOn 4,108 launches from 1,156 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.5% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →
This documentThe same launch document, byte for byte, as 3,632 other launches, across 1,097 creator wallets in all. Across the archive, 33% of the launches whose document we hold carry one byte-identical to a different creator's. See them →
This creator279 earlier launches, 1 confirmed complete on chain. Across the archive, 70.7% of launches come from a creator with more than one launch on record. See the creator's launches →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NameDoomed Yeti
Descriptionthe real method
Metadata heldsha256 7355faa06603b073f3975f278e94c3a351fde092fd8a95c43323ae08e27de398 · 197 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 30f4c88c63b9929ab499a409dc423b059aac0893b076de8e48f0aa8035f02ff2 · 38,468 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-10 20:15 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another