JEANLAZY
The curve completed 20s after launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
findingIt left the curve 20s after launch.
noteOnly 2.2 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-23 14:32 UTC |
| Creator | 8HXyr9n8Fbjduf6AA5yNb5RqJS83tUqgFMhE3Xt1r6mV |
| Creator took | 0.2% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 28 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 28 within the first 30s, 10 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 0 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 4Mcr8RFjeS1DhSjK7m21ML… slot 449,731,450
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-23 14:32:29 UTC Slot 449,731,450, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 10 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-23 14:32:48 UTC +20s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-23 14:32:48 UTC +20s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Thirty seconds in | 28 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | No other launch we hold a picture for used this one. |
| This ticker | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This creator | 1 earlier launch, 0 confirmed graduated on chain. See the creator's launches → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 2.2 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-24 20:43 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Jean Lazy |
| Metadata held | sha256 902f4febf103b2ea6977355896f37626131a8774c57f114f716237b2946ca4dc · 313 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Document re-read | Byte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-24 14:33 UTC. |
| Picture held | sha256 5f403d82ac505485e65ae545b1b7d065d5f3141ce8f6dfcf1be2afbd3aa45e90 · 204,768 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-23 14:32 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.