Dots uni
The curve completed 18s after launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
findingIt left the curve 18s after launch.
noteOnly 0.1 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-30 05:03 UTC |
| Creator | EPUHHAwV4ecwtayCm7cjdzs6Zegy8YR4VjihjTerH1VR |
| Creator took | 0.7% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 33 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 13 within the first 30s, 0 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 0 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 5X2fKvUgaXNMTNRiovMcBC… slot 451,864,618
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-30 05:03:12 UTC Slot 451,864,618, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | No wallet bought in the block the token was created in. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-30 05:03:30 UTC +18s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-30 05:03:30 UTC +18s
1.208e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Thirty seconds in | 13 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 3 launches from 1 creator wallet, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This creator | 4 earlier launches, 0 confirmed graduated on chain. See the creator's launches → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 0.1 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-10-01 17:46 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Dots |
| Description | https://x.com/dots?s=11 |
| Metadata held | sha256 27b6316dd128bb5f854d5b614d08f62a2aa45aebf1d81849d134f6746d4b34e0 · 213 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Document re-read | Byte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-10-01 05:03 UTC. |
| Picture held | sha256 8d0264345a4e96521935f65288841b18a9e39a9fb94ebacd16dd747b90a5a129 · 235,518 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-30 05:03 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.