LLINU

No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 2 other launches from 3 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 55.9% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

7chNn7uuCeg8wbk6Z3sN1vYd7URnzvjcBT7aAZVnjMDx Solscan

Cite this record as: Chain of Title, LLINU (ALLINU), mint 7chNn7uuCeg8wbk6Z3sN1vYd7URnzvjcBT7aAZVnjMDx, observed at creation 2026-11-09 02:04 UTC. Chain of Title, a register of Solana token launches recorded at creation. https://chainoftitle.org/t/7chNn7uuCeg8wbk6Z3sN1vYd7URnzvjcBT7aAZVnjMDx

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

not establishedThis launch was recorded live, but its venue's trade events do not name the wallet that traded. Who bought on the bonding curve, and whether the creator sold, are therefore not on our record - not zero, and not checked and cleared. The creator's share of supply, the launch's own claim about itself, and whether the curve completed are recorded as normal.

At launch

Created	2026-11-09 02:04 UTC
Creator	BREyVNDuRVEb6fper7BpJHyC8tdH7bEqvL377f2iRBUc
Creator took	1.3% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers	unknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else.
Graduated	not while we were watching
Curve on chain	Nothing to confirm. This launch never reached a graduation threshold while we watched, so there was no completion to check against the curve account. Most tokens end this way, and it is not a finding about them.
Creator sold	not recorded - this venue's trades do not name the wallet
Recorded from	3q2A7c17MSBetNECSWwgwD… slot 467,143,284 The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recorded	curve_buyers, unique_buyers, snap30_buyers, bundled_buyers - this launch's venue publishes trade events that do not name the wallet that traded, so no count of people can be taken from them - which is not zero and not a clean result. peak_price - we decoded no price for this launch at all - the column holds what we SAW, and a launch we stopped following has a peak that stops with us. Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Seen before

This picture

On 3 launches from 3 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 55.9% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth

Name	ALLINU
Description	Created on https://rapidlaunch.io
Metadata held	sha256 4d3d5e1423365cce20266e5fa38a1d6126bd2c2c781e658abc92db5447b1f2c3 · 406 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture held	sha256 53f662b776c2bf175e5695f7781c6b7ea4142a30bc8f199ed2ac5f6273f35bd4 · 8,248 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-11-09 02:04 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another

Keep this launch as a document

A dated extract of this one launch, frozen at the moment you buy it: every other launch that carried the byte-identical picture or document, this creator's other launches, and what this register checked. A page you can send to someone, and a clean PDF from your browser's print dialogue.

No account needed; the link arrives by email and is permanent. It is this register's own output, with no signature and no attestation: the scoped, signed version written for a dispute is a provenance report. Everything on this page stays free.

Several launches in one matter

A pack of 10 of these documents is $200, redeemed one launch at a time whenever you find the next one. You get a code by email; it does not expire.