AU
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
At launch
| Created | 2026-10-01 15:49 UTC |
| Creator | 95ZCf3jKMHeFYvPXVZW3Ek6AEPDyjebosqnc7eNioVMo |
| Creator took | 12.4% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | unknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve. |
| Graduated | 2.1 h after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not recorded - this venue's trades do not name the wallet |
| Recorded from | 3MYMVd8cYKFbryh5vrQAVN… slot 452,332,630
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
| Not recorded | curve_buyers, unique_buyers, snap30_buyers, bundled_buyers - this launch's venue publishes trade events that do not name the wallet that traded, so no count of people can be taken from them - which is not zero and not a clean result.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against
one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the
published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-10-01 15:49:25 UTC Slot 452,332,630, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-10-01 15:49:25 UTC
0.000e+0 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Curve completed | 2026-10-01 17:57:48 UTC +2h 08m 23s Confirmed against the venue's own completion state. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 52 launches from 46 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This creator | 219 earlier launches, 10 confirmed graduated on chain, 5 with findings on record. See the creator's launches → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 123 other creator wallets, across 148 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. The linkage sits in a component too large for this record to state as one group; the record states that exclusion. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Always Up |
| Metadata held | sha256 20907432a732d39dd2e2ef5ac39c92d08b48838e15cc06ef50d88080441666a5 · 360 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 e48fb1c9c1743c079dc39cb50dd41aeae2e9c395f35864efd65648ba945f3392 · 9,514 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-01 15:49 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.