1,263,335 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 03:03 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Pro

GOLDCAT

No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

9ZhBWrsVTgdWsM31EP9nBEvw3KXEE4qL4Aq2FFZrhLxX Solscan

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

not establishedThis launch was recorded live, but its venue's trade events do not name the wallet that traded. Who bought on the bonding curve, and whether the creator sold, are therefore not on our record - not zero, and not checked and cleared. The creator's share of supply, the launch's own claim about itself, and whether the curve completed are recorded as normal.

At launch

Created2026-10-02 18:10 UTC
CreatorFghbNc4A8SCijoT3f3bWzd7gfjo2aM3NQPZsZdvA9eGC
Creator took0.0% of supply in the first block
Outside buyersunknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else.
Graduated7 min after launch
Curve on chainNot read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch.
Creator soldnot recorded - this venue's trades do not name the wallet
Recorded from2s1YGfq5WemgiCTBLcpqAT… slot 452,687,020
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recordedcurve_buyers, unique_buyers, snap30_buyers, bundled_buyers - this launch's venue publishes trade events that do not name the wallet that traded, so no count of people can be taken from them - which is not zero and not a clean result. peak_price - we decoded no price for this launch at all - the column holds what we SAW, and a launch we stopped following has a peak that stops with us.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Keep this launch as a document

A dated extract of this one launch, frozen at the moment you buy it: every other launch that carried the byte-identical picture or document, this creator's other launches, and what this register checked. A page you can send to someone, and a clean PDF from your browser's print dialogue.

No account needed; the link arrives by email and is permanent. It is this register's own output, with no signature and no attestation: the scoped, signed version written for a dispute is a provenance report. Everything on this page stays free.

Order of events

Created2026-10-02 18:10:43 UTC
Slot 452,687,020, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Curve completed2026-10-02 18:17:20 UTC +6m 38s
Confirmed against the venue's own completion state.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureNo other launch we hold a picture for used this one.
This tickerOn 57 launches from 37 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. See this ticker's page →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
Name招き猫
Description— @jevdesk Launched on https://www.jevdesk.com/
Metadata heldsha256 a266ed25a7fda3cfbcfa05f262ac430e74aa0a4f5fdbb061da846a8c5cb70898 · 346 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 3cb00ad9f1d32e03e5abef2dcb59c6beb593d2fe465ec0264f35bc7e9f4d7151 · 226,635 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-02 18:10 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another