1,237,522 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 18:03 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Pro

IDENTITY

The curve completed 25s after launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

AVBVWJSZzqHQWEVQJ8vpW6AWQ1qngKKNLo2wxxAVHVZ7 Solscan pump.fun
findingIt left the curve 25s after launch.
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.

At launch

Created2026-10-02 15:58 UTC
Creator93pKH2McQwU6spb7gMLSGCNcfLXoLjNrDpaMJUy2Xci9
Creator took0.2% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers37 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 10 within the first 30s, 2 bundled into the creation block.
Graduated0 min after launch
Curve, read on chainComplete. We read the bonding curve account 2.6 h ago and it was finished. Checked 2026-10-02 17:31 UTC.
Creator soldyes
Recorded from5WN8DaQvwHygZw75VN1dJ7… slot 452,657,341
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.

Order of events

Created2026-10-02 15:58:06 UTC
Slot 452,657,341, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation block2 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist.
Curve completed2026-10-02 15:58:31 UTC +25s
Confirmed against the venue's own completion state.
Highest price seen2026-10-02 15:58:32 UTC +25s
1.343e-7 SOL per token. Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.
Thirty seconds in10 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureOn 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them →
This tickerOn 4 launches from 4 creator wallets, including this one. See them →
This creator779 earlier launches, 1 confirmed graduated on chain. See the creator's launches →
Birth artifactsLaunches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 105 other creator wallets, across 134 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. The linkage sits in a component too large for this record to state as one group; the record states that exclusion. See the linked wallets →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NameReviewing The Identity
Description"Reviewing the identity. identity." Transcribed from specimen ILM-KS-05 (Kishu), deployment cycle 6717, coherence 35.4%. Compiled and deployed by the Inu Language Model.
Metadata heldsha256 2b25e7e1532691622253127c61176637052dd16e0e8b1f0685bc41c5d0d18a4f · 505 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 1a563a7f8ab49b9a58537beef680d6138fe7f4cf41a9f941ca2b38eb1d0912ba · 132,973 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-02 15:58 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another