broker
The curve completed in the same batch of events as the launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
findingIt left the curve 0s after launch.
noteOnly 2.0 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-18 14:56 UTC |
| Creator | 3YY26ayjXMks64BYYH2bK6VbnZeuVbY9EZgvS8H8XMSA |
| Creator took | 0.1% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 10 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 10 within the first 30s, 10 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 0 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 5KbBP2Jo3wBgMZ5XmKzZ9P… slot 448,116,822
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-18 14:56:36 UTC Slot 448,116,822, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 10 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-18 14:56:36 UTC +0s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Thirty seconds in | 10 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-18 15:01:58 UTC +5m 22s
6.402e-7 SOL per token.
Reported by a third-party price feed with no trade witnessed, which is a materially weaker claim than a
decoded one.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | No other launch we hold a picture for used this one. |
| This ticker | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 2.0 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-20 00:49 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | broker |
| Metadata held | sha256 ff836dfb65b9288801c4921ae8335b50f14ad9ecf0e055685b37e14a6a84627d · 365 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Document re-read | Byte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-19 16:18 UTC. |
| Picture held | sha256 d896eed015e2e8d30f349a0743ced34ed1b76c5bbd790a0ad968fbee1af32d8d · 243,324 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-18 14:56 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.