3,660,724 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 03:05 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Brand Protection
The picture this launch published at birth

Launch record · observed at creation 2026-11-14 20:01 UTC

bill

BDEpiseTo9KLGvNqiViZMnMN85Xq3X2gen9sEqnca4W Solscan

What this launch shares with other launches

Free on this page: that each of these exists, and how many. The list behind a count, meaning which launches, which wallets and the transaction for each, opens with a free account for 5 lists, or with Brand Protection at $79 a month for every list on every record. Watch this creator wallet: a free account is emailed the next time it launches. This one launch can also be kept as a $49 document with its identical-file and creator lists, further down this page.

Its own first blocks

0.0%of supply taken by the creator in the first block
Yesreached a graduation threshold while we watched
No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 1 other launch from 2 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.5% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

not establishedThis launch was recorded live, but its venue's trade events do not name the wallet that traded. Who bought on the bonding curve, and whether the creator sold, are therefore not on our record - not zero, and not checked and cleared. The creator's share of supply, the launch's own claim about itself, and whether the curve completed are recorded as normal.

At launch

Created2026-11-14 20:01 UTC
CreatorHCBU9gf5G9yXCeewkXuj2XAy8fNULsDu15vA412DhYS8
Creator took0.0% of supply in the first block
Outside buyersunknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else.
Graduated6 min after launch
Curve on chainNot read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch.
Creator soldnot recorded - this venue's trades do not name the wallet
Recorded from3xC2Gd9BrvdgbdGCpzgCN8… slot 469,454,329
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recordedcurve_buyers, unique_buyers, snap30_buyers, bundled_buyers - this launch's venue publishes trade events that do not name the wallet that traded, so no count of people can be taken from them - which is not zero and not a clean result. peak_price - we decoded no price for this launch at all - the column holds what we SAW, and a launch we stopped following has a peak that stops with us.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Order of events

Created2026-11-14 20:01:42 UTC
Slot 469,454,329, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Curve completed2026-11-14 20:07:25 UTC +5m 43s
Confirmed against the venue's own completion state.

Times are the blocks' own timestamps, to the second: events in the same block share one, so their order within a block is not shown here.

Seen before

This pictureOn 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.5% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them →
This tickerOn 931 launches from 693 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.7% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
Namebill
Metadata heldsha256 71ce369ed5a5c3f09f0a9f9fcb650ef03874c05c6ca35661c28c1fe822d2e68b · 345 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 76118976ba4df9b25b56675e6c0c040ed4c9ce6d7ceaeb88cc0a333631589904 · 8,404 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-11-14 20:01 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another