PERP
No finding either wayWe watched this launch. It matches none of the patterns we record, and it does not meet every criterion for a record with no markers. Neither endorsed nor accused.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 0.1 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-10-01 14:49 UTC |
| Creator | FjQjaPU9xxjSnGExoajSLpw1rDVkeM2BDU51HxsSLVCi |
| Creator took | 0.2% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 31 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 4 within the first 30s, 0 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 9 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | yes |
| Recorded from | 3ZfZmyqrr4wC99ZgMstsRw… slot 452,319,161
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-10-01 14:49:02 UTC Slot 452,319,161, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | No wallet bought in the block the token was created in. |
| Thirty seconds in | 4 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-10-01 14:58:00 UTC +8m 57s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-10-01 14:58:08 UTC +9m 06s
6.268e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 4 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 41 launches from 36 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This creator | 3 earlier launches, 0 confirmed graduated on chain. See the creator's launches → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 0.1 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-10-01 23:04 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Pump PERPXT |
| Description | Pump perp Funded Future |
| Metadata held | sha256 9987d92ad54a684b6c4f680183a10d72582eb4ab6e07598d6938b2ce0900c09b · 321 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 d3de51bd590711c400f35ff6a283d7300c73efe998a747518ab6b73de0dd7291 · 31,302 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-01 14:49 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.