3,400,377 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 00:12 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Brand Protection

No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

Bhuwp5fvaQXhV78irMS7frfyEdKdVWmbDtV64iwppump Solscan pump.fun

Cite this record as: Chain of Title, (Cybercab), mint Bhuwp5fvaQXhV78irMS7frfyEdKdVWmbDtV64iwppump, observed at creation 2026-11-09 09:21 UTC. Chain of Title, a register of Solana token launches recorded at creation. https://chainoftitle.org/t/Bhuwp5fvaQXhV78irMS7frfyEdKdVWmbDtV64iwppump

At launch

Created2026-11-09 09:21 UTC
Creator4XJUtniK4EgWjS59YV3CimUBYr3Y1JZ5iEWTj2muNRks
Creator took6.6% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers2 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 2 within the first 30s, 2 in the very same block the token was created in - a block is one batch of transactions, so those buys and the creation were confirmed together.
Graduatednot while we were watching
Curve on chainNothing to confirm. This launch never reached a graduation threshold while we watched, so there was no completion to check against the curve account. Most tokens end this way, and it is not a finding about them.
Creator soldnot while we watched
Recorded from7PUQ5JiDjz5tBXGGprEezK… slot 467,265,318
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recordedpeak_price - we decoded no price for this launch at all - the column holds what we SAW, and a launch we stopped following has a peak that stops with us.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Keep this launch as a document

A dated extract of this one launch, frozen at the moment you buy it: every other launch that carried the byte-identical picture or document, this creator's other launches, and what this register checked. A page you can send to someone, and a clean PDF from your browser's print dialogue.

No account needed; the link arrives by email and is permanent. It is this register's own output, with no signature and no attestation: the scoped, signed version written for a dispute is a provenance report. Everything on this page stays free.

Several launches in one matter

A pack of 10 of these documents is $200, redeemed one launch at a time whenever you find the next one. You get a code by email; it does not expire.

Order of events

Created2026-11-09 09:21:46 UTC
Slot 467,265,318, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation block2 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist.
Thirty seconds in2 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureNo other launch we hold a picture for used this one.

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NameCybercab
DescriptionDeployed using https://j7tracker.io
Metadata heldsha256 8ddbad653f7c56704bf63f77fc53c2501402993a4d22505d2854d736a30f45ab · 279 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 edad0477c5c83b27e4912106bf9d477dc93d55683f30620b704ab96f636f1aa4 · 11,468 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-11-09 09:21 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another