UI
No finding either wayWe watched this launch. It matches none of the patterns we record, and it does not meet every criterion for a record with no markers. Neither endorsed nor accused.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 5.8 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-30 18:08 UTC |
| Creator | DWHEZ8JnfGtud25Gjhn3MndpTMshNEd12WMu2ciCa7ri |
| Creator took | 9.8% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 1,104 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 179 within the first 30s, 10 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 15 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Complete. We read the bonding curve account 4.8 h ago and it was finished. Checked 2026-09-30 18:32 UTC. |
| Creator sold | yes |
| Recorded from | 2msFauffBqGjQPWK6BUeHw… slot 452,040,793
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-30 18:08:25 UTC Slot 452,040,793, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 10 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Thirty seconds in | 179 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-30 18:23:16 UTC +14m 51s Confirmed against the venue's own completion state. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-30 18:23:16 UTC +14m 51s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 97 launches from 90 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This creator | 187 earlier launches, 5 confirmed graduated on chain. See the creator's launches → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 186 other creator wallets, across 197 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. The linkage sits in a component too large for this record to state as one group; the record states that exclusion. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 5.8 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-30 23:20 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Ultra Inu |
| Metadata held | sha256 bdd6cb1fa397c6de35407762123d7d42eb122a94028c9f526509c7eeaba89a13 · 424 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 cc80dcb669f8118e57951ec98837c8a299906abb2481569b3f659bda06739ef0 · 34,264 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-30 18:08 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.