NiuLai/ACC
The curve completed in the same batch of events as the launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
findingIt left the curve 0s after launch.
noteOnly 2.2 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-29 18:51 UTC |
| Creator | HeHQH7z2RH4XaheMMVHBA86PHXToT3P4w4krAeUeyvjy |
| Creator took | 0.0% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 10 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 10 within the first 30s, 10 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 0 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 4jA3X15jYHVwfgBDijfXWh… slot 451,727,657
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-29 18:51:59 UTC Slot 451,727,657, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 10 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-29 18:51:59 UTC +0s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-29 18:51:59 UTC +0s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Thirty seconds in | 10 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | No other launch we hold a picture for used this one. |
Pool
| Liquidity | 2.2 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-10-01 00:48 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Niu Lai Accelerationism |
| Description | Same expression. Different laws of physics. |
| Metadata held | sha256 0080d63bebc9e0bee4540e85f2ce1dc97b3bf64bdca57401009be6f21bf6dc77 · 418 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Document re-read | Byte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-30 18:52 UTC. |
| Picture held | sha256 e5633dbbbc5583a7e2f9f90ea335cdadb2f2a6a0bb2e3ddf6f6be68a4bec1253 · 179,362 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-29 18:51 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.