1,488,186 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 6 Oct 2026
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Pro

JUICE

The creator took 20% of supply at launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this creator has 2 other launches on record. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. We did not record its creation transaction, so these figures rest on our observation at the time rather than on a citation you can follow. Not a prediction and not advice.

CqvvbAKneww1K56qRsfVbCHgV8LAxJ684QRgX2Tmpump Solscan pump.fun

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

noteThe creator took 20.1% of supply at launch.

At launch

Created2026-09-02 14:49 UTC
CreatorFJzsAv6x9PxBJ2VkZhGAhAh2d5mWBFamJodRvGtgsRAB
Creator took20.1% of supply in the first block
Outside buyersunknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 1 within the first 30s, 1 in the very same block the token was created in - a block is one batch of transactions, so those buys and the creation were confirmed together.
Graduatednot while we were watching
Curve on chainNothing to confirm. This launch never reached a graduation threshold while we watched, so there was no completion to check against the curve account. Most tokens end this way, and it is not a finding about them.
Creator soldnot while we watched
Recorded fromNot recorded. This launch predates our keeping the creation transaction (2026-09-09), and its trade rows had been pruned by retention before the backfill could recover the signature from them. The figures above stand on our own observation alone, which is weaker than a citation, and we would rather say so than leave the gap unmarked.
Not recordedcurve_buyers - its trade rows had already been sampled at finalize or pruned by retention before anything counted them, so any count over the survivors would be a floor rather than a measurement.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Keep this launch as a document

A dated extract of this one launch, frozen at the moment you buy it: every other launch that carried the byte-identical picture or document, this creator's other launches, and what this register checked. A page you can send to someone, and a clean PDF from your browser's print dialogue.

No account needed; the link arrives by email and is permanent. It is this register's own output, with no signature and no attestation: the scoped, signed version written for a dispute is a provenance report. Everything on this page stays free.

Order of events

Created2026-09-02 14:49:39 UTC
Creation block1 wallet bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist.
Thirty seconds in1 distinct buyer, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.
Highest price seen2026-09-02 14:52:51 UTC +3m 12s
4.372e-8 SOL per token. Source not recorded, which is every row written before 2026-09-10 - never that the peak was unsourced. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureNo other launch we hold a picture for used this one.
This tickerOn 67 launches from 49 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 86.4% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →
This creator2 earlier launches, none of which reached a graduation threshold while we watched. Across the archive, 71.6% of launches come from a creator with more than one launch on record. See the creator's launches →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NameJUICE COIN
DescriptionFRSH
Metadata heldsha256 874dcb82665d93b3d0ae46a55bef325711dcae8de3c45fbf86fb3cdbdc9075a9
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 8811882f25fd67fe9ce47bf07ab1e22917bee24a2711cab19f9cd8c1df8932c1 · 2,703,491 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-10 21:16 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another