Launch record · observed at creation 2026-09-26 14:36 UTC
ORAGENT
Orvix Agent
Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 3 other launches from 4 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.4% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.
Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-26 14:36 UTC |
| Creator | 7QhpTYzQDwXjoc1UaYG9ttzd3YttHwHESEGGxRAufP6Z |
| Creator took | 23.1% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | unknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else. |
| Graduated | 2 min after launch |
| Curve on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not recorded - this venue's trades do not name the wallet |
| Recorded from | 31fxBzTVjy8JhC2xj9GeWA… slot 450,703,221
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
| Not recorded | curve_buyers, unique_buyers, snap30_buyers, bundled_buyers - this launch's venue publishes trade events that do not name the wallet that traded, so no count of people can be taken from them - which is not zero and not a clean result.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against
one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the
published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-26 14:36:10 UTC Slot 450,703,221, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-26 14:36:10 UTC
0.000e+0 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-26 14:37:44 UTC +1m 34s Confirmed against the venue's own completion state. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 4 launches from 4 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.4% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them → |
| This document | The same launch document, byte for byte, as 1 other launch, across 2 creator wallets in all. Across the archive, 33.2% of the launches whose document we hold carry one byte-identical to a different creator's. See them → |
| Files shared with other wallets | Launches by this creator were made with files byte-identical to those of 1 other creator wallet, across 3 shared files, each matched by its sha256 fingerprint. Sharing a file establishes that the same file was used, never that the same person used it. Following those shared files outward reaches a group so large that this register stops being able to tell individual hands apart inside it, so it does not name the group or state a size. That limit is published with the method rather than left for a reader to discover. Across the archive, 63.8% of launches come from a creator linked to at least one other wallet this way. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Orvix Agent |
| Metadata held | sha256 8dbc7a4611915c40e4f4db196e700cd4daa67b6e26da0e64402be3d04336ba88 · 240 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Document re-read | Byte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-10-03 14:36 UTC. |
| Picture held | sha256 91720cb0cedea27790983ac3e3d8cf901fa6698b52b0572457fcd1787416445d · 14,473 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-26 14:36 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.