643,708 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 22:17 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Pro

BABYCATE

The curve completed in the same batch of events as the launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

DM6QJn7vX9D5peZioa9ESJFxtL4SjS2LuGxkFR6S4Gqi Solscan
not establishedThis launch was recorded live, but its venue's trade events do not name the wallet that traded. Who bought on the bonding curve, and whether the creator sold, are therefore not on our record - not zero, and not checked and cleared. The creator's share of supply, the launch's own claim about itself, and whether the curve completed are recorded as normal.
findingIt left the curve 0s after launch.

At launch

Created2026-09-22 17:01 UTC
CreatorB3LToARssZnW7tFwmnbReqcsXfAsheB959UZfsisfRoG
Creator took20.0% of supply in the first block
Outside buyersunknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve.
Graduatedin the same batch of events as the launch
Curve, read on chainNot read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch.
Creator soldnot recorded - this venue's trades do not name the wallet
Recorded fromYVJvWBG5yjHx1AmhJDcMzd… slot 449,440,117
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recordedcurve_buyers, unique_buyers, snap30_buyers, bundled_buyers - this launch's venue publishes trade events that do not name the wallet that traded, so no count of people can be taken from them - which is not zero and not a clean result. peak_price - we decoded no price for this launch at all - the column holds what we SAW, and a launch we stopped following has a peak that stops with us.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Order of events

Created2026-09-22 17:01:25 UTC
Slot 449,440,117, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Curve completed2026-09-22 17:01:25 UTC
Confirmed against the venue's own completion state.

Times are the blocks' own timestamps, to the second: events in the same block share one, so their order within a block is not shown here.

Seen before

This tickerOn 163 launches from 116 creator wallets, including this one. See them →
This documentByte-identical to 5 other launches' metadata document. See them →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

NameBaby Catecoin
Description$CATE is sending like crazy atm. The brother of CATE (DOGE) had a baby runner which went to 100M+ so CATE needs one as well! Its time for $BABYCATE to takeover!
Metadata heldsha256 1e9d664a85b527feb78a982a9e03e090dc1acf4807f2a763fbcf8befd68de676 · 439 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
PictureNot captured, so we cannot show what it published. That is our storage budget, not a finding about the launch.

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-22 17:03 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another