SuperBoner
The curve completed 31s after launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
findingIt left the curve 31s after launch.
noteOnly 1.4 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-30 19:39 UTC |
| Creator | 6Xge9EQ21rvQA12dUoSEwGCPb6miFqawFDudaW8v6Y6s |
| Creator took | 0.0% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 44 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 44 within the first 30s, 7 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 1 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 4M7fEGCpkSAtB4jteDmf7H… slot 452,061,123
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-30 19:39:26 UTC Slot 452,061,123, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 7 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Thirty seconds in | 44 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-30 19:39:57 UTC +31s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-30 19:39:57 UTC +31s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 1.4 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-30 23:31 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Super Boner |
| Description | An absurdly heroic meme coin for the bold. No suit, no permission - just pure, unreasonably confident energy. |
| Metadata held | sha256 a503f376fb7f0d9cb2de059d2998c36763c14f349c4e825e4e8a887de9c49ad7 · 453 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 3752dbad01c17452c213455307a37adc39c3f791ba5c540ab32dc342a6f9028a · 282,363 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-30 19:39 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.