3,511,014 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 06:31 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Brand Protection
The picture this launch published at birth

Launch record · observed at creation 2026-11-12 00:56 UTC

TOMMO

FreeDannytommo

DtjrWGEyFfUs6W3qH4DN764zSP8EMgHA7YMTSDoSyray Solscan
66.8%of supply taken by the creator in the first block
Yesreached a graduation threshold while we watched
13launches carry this ticker, from 9 creator wallets
7other launches declared this same launch document, byte for byte
7other launches used this exact picture file
The creator took 67% of supply at launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 7 other launches from 4 creator wallets in all, and this creator has 1 other launch on record. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.3% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

not establishedThis launch was recorded live, but its venue's trade events do not name the wallet that traded. Who bought on the bonding curve, and whether the creator sold, are therefore not on our record - not zero, and not checked and cleared. The creator's share of supply, the launch's own claim about itself, and whether the curve completed are recorded as normal.
findingThe creator bought its own bonding curve - 50 SOL, from the same wallet that created the token.
findingThe creator took 66.8% of the entire supply in the first block. Nothing visible on-chain today shows this - the float has since been spread across wallets.
findingThat purchase is what completed the curve: the token left the curve on the creator's own money.
noteTook 2 bonding curves outright. 220 SOL spent on curves. We hold no market trades for it in either direction, so what it did with the tokens afterwards is not on our record.

At launch

Created2026-11-12 00:56 UTC
CreatorGQWUA4t4LXXpdeqU2Yn1XtY9sZUqexpNYXTbY3Fx4rVB
Creator took66.8% of supply in the first block
Outside buyersunknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else.
Graduated6 min after launch
Curve on chainNot read. We have the feed's graduation event and have not confirmed it against the curve account itself. That is a gap in our checking, not a finding about this launch.
Creator soldnot recorded - this venue's trades do not name the wallet
Recorded from5J8SYAJYnky9q6k63uPHhG… slot 468,332,137
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recordedcurve_buyers, unique_buyers, snap30_buyers, bundled_buyers - this launch's venue publishes trade events that do not name the wallet that traded, so no count of people can be taken from them - which is not zero and not a clean result.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Order of events

Created2026-11-12 00:56:39 UTC
Slot 468,332,137, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Highest price seen2026-11-12 00:56:39 UTC +0s
2.796e-8 SOL per token. Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.
Curve completed2026-11-12 01:02:10 UTC +5m 31s
Confirmed against the venue's own completion state.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureOn 8 launches from 4 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.3% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them →
This tickerOn 13 launches from 9 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.5% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →
This documentThe same launch document, byte for byte, as 7 other launches, across 4 creator wallets in all. Across the archive, 33.1% of the launches whose document we hold carry one byte-identical to a different creator's. See them →
This creator1 earlier launch, none of which reached a graduation threshold while we watched, 1 with findings on record. Across the archive, 70.6% of launches come from a creator with more than one launch on record. See the creator's launches →
Files shared with other walletsLaunches by this creator were made with files byte-identical to those of 4 other creator wallets, across 6 shared files, each matched by its sha256 fingerprint. Sharing a file establishes that the same file was used, never that the same person used it. Following those shared files outward reaches a group so large that this register stops being able to tell individual hands apart inside it, so it does not name the group or state a size. That limit is published with the method rather than left for a reader to discover. Across the archive, 63.9% of launches come from a creator linked to at least one other wallet this way. See the linked wallets →

Who took the curve

One transaction bought 50 SOL of this curve, in the same batch of events as the launch, from the creator's own wallet. The wallet and the transaction →

That is the same transaction the token was created in: the launch and the purchase of its float are one signature.

Our launch and trade timestamps are both taken when the events are decoded, so events that arrived together carry the same one. That it was taken at or near launch is on the record; how many seconds after is not.

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NameFreeDannytommo
DescriptionFREE DANNY TOMMO
Metadata heldsha256 b68d91eaf6486b1bcbeb8ed9dd2e8bee76abf6f45f88ba86d376ed884b5a83b4 · 200 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 f22c361f15ed4dbe7dafc94b4e0f685e0810ae5f004d35faa9d7fc268882f0bb · 450,819 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-11-12 00:56 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another