wouldphil
The curve completed in the same batch of events as the launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
findingOnly 6 outside buyers bought on the bonding curve before it graduated.
findingIt left the curve 0s after launch.
noteOnly 2.0 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-21 12:11 UTC |
| Creator | CqoEnAHWb5nAiLuJgS4xDCJhVXo9w1v5EUK5V5USrEkr |
| Creator took | 0.2% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 6 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 6 within the first 30s, 6 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 0 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Complete. We read the bonding curve account 1.2 days ago and it was finished. Checked 2026-09-21 12:11 UTC. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 3yYF3GzNLFKTxkzegqXW9w… slot 449,051,472
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-21 12:11:00 UTC Slot 449,051,472, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 6 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Curve completed | 2026-09-21 12:11:00 UTC +0s Confirmed against the venue's own completion state. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-21 12:11:00 UTC +0s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Thirty seconds in | 6 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | No other launch we hold a picture for used this one. |
Pool
| Liquidity | 2.0 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-09-22 18:09 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | wouldphil |
| Description | The haircut is serious. Absolutely nothing else is. |
| Metadata held | sha256 9b90e493eaf4b4c3d5fca90f42be555ca9f58d7875e6d0b93e9b5aaac5ca235c · 368 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Document re-read | Byte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-22 12:11 UTC. |
| Picture held | sha256 00d6b1a828461fea3344be95edfbeba65ba9d4ed03de2384c5a4ebb6dd627f4b · 2,769,720 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-21 12:11 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.