Launch record · observed at creation 2026-10-16 15:18 UTC
MEND
MENDROCK
What this launch shares with other launches
Free on this page: that each of these exists, and how many. The list behind a count, meaning which launches, which wallets and the transaction for each, opens with a free account for 5 lists, or with Brand Protection at $79 a month for every list on every record. Watch this creator wallet: a free account is emailed the next time it launches. This one launch can also be kept as a $49 document with its identical-file and creator lists, further down this page.
Its own first blocks
Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this creator has 6 other launches on record. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.
Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.
At launch
| Created | 2026-10-16 15:18 UTC |
| Creator | 5Z7ioRBveDe4MV4CB889HuPiaEVVMDaDJEeJcsPGcMZu |
| Creator took | 21.8% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | unknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else. |
| Graduated | not while we were watching |
| Curve on chain | Nothing to confirm. This launch never reached a graduation threshold while we watched, so there was no completion to check against the curve account. Most tokens end this way, and it is not a finding about them. |
| Creator sold | not recorded - this venue's trades do not name the wallet |
| Recorded from | xpdsm6zLojpyWohn74LZFD… slot 457,684,725
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
| Not recorded | curve_buyers, unique_buyers, snap30_buyers, bundled_buyers - this launch's venue publishes trade events that do not name the wallet that traded, so no count of people can be taken from them - which is not zero and not a clean result. peak_price - we decoded no price for this launch at all - the column holds what we SAW, and a launch we stopped following has a peak that stops with us.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against
one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the
published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down. |
Seen before
| This picture | No other launch we hold a picture for used this one. |
| This ticker | On 12 launches from 12 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.7% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page → |
| This creator | 6 earlier launches, none of which reached a graduation threshold while we watched. Across the archive, 70.7% of launches come from a creator with more than one launch on record. See the creator's launches → |
| Files shared with other wallets | Launches by this creator were made with files byte-identical to those of 1 other creator wallet, across 2 shared files, each matched by its sha256 fingerprint. Sharing a file establishes that the same file was used, never that the same person used it. Following those shared files outward reaches a group so large that this register stops being able to tell individual hands apart inside it, so it does not name the group or state a size. That limit is published with the method rather than left for a reader to discover. Across the archive, 63.7% of launches come from a creator linked to at least one other wallet this way. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | MENDROCK |
| Description | Concrete with dormant limestone-making bacteria and their food mixed in. When a crack lets water in, the bacteria wake up and fill the crack with limestone. Small cracks seal on their own, without a repair crew, before water and salt can reach the steel inside. The deliverables are: - the mix design and capsule format for the bacteria; - the crack widths it can seal; - a test-panel plan; - a cost comparison with repairing a standard bridge deck. |
| Metadata held | sha256 6c9359d5b018fb6167216804fa2102b34568f7f6902bfd92b8fa045a2d0a8d00 · 955 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 2f456b11dd91552c62826ed6ed875c5cc7f169e8b15fbf8d29a301442cde3821 · 65,253 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-17 04:12 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.