4.9%of supply taken by the creator in the first block
429outside wallets bought on the bonding curve
Yesreached a graduation threshold while we watched
244launches carry this ticker, from 173 creator wallets1other launch declared this same launch document, byte for byte
2other launches used this exact picture file
No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.
Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 2 other launches from 3 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.3% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.
Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 2.1 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-11-12 16:05 UTC |
| Creator | HUKwK5hpaRLuh6JhQT4abzbpz2gwBJpSY8oFE5oTccxF |
| Creator took | 4.9% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 429 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 107 within the first 30s, 18 in the very same block the token was created in - a block is one batch of transactions, so those buys and the creation were confirmed together. |
| Graduated | 2 min after launch |
| Curve on chain | Complete. We read the bonding curve account 6.8 h ago and it was finished. Checked 2026-11-12 16:30 UTC. |
| Creator sold | yes |
| Recorded from | 5oDk7bPdBk9LMsHDqVmtXx… slot 468,585,827
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
| Not recorded | peak_price - we decoded no price for this launch at all - the column holds what we SAW, and a launch we stopped following has a peak that stops with us.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against
one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the
published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-11-12 16:05:35 UTC Slot 468,585,827, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 18 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Thirty seconds in | 107 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-11-12 16:07:44 UTC +2m 08s Confirmed against the venue's own completion state. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 3 launches from 3 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.3% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them → |
| This ticker | On 244 launches from 173 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.6% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page → |
| This document | The same launch document, byte for byte, as 1 other launch, across 2 creator wallets in all. Across the archive, 33.2% of the launches whose document we hold carry one byte-identical to a different creator's. See them → |
| Files shared with other wallets | Launches by this creator were made with files byte-identical to those of 1 other creator wallet, across 2 shared files, each matched by its sha256 fingerprint. Sharing a file establishes that the same file was used, never that the same person used it. Following those shared files outward reaches a group of 2 creator wallets in all. Across the archive, 63.8% of launches come from a creator linked to at least one other wallet this way. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 2.1 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-11-12 23:19 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Tim Cook Gay |
| Description | Nvidia should hand Huang's job to Tim Cook, per Trump. |
| Metadata held | sha256 2af204efd2b62daf4d8af41c2705d37341962bdeff308c9ec962eaf2079a9d22 · 302 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 24245efd57757f4ac3f0e044d0616db7d4ef6d85bd5afc7effa4c14e5fa1fe19 · 14,098 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-11-12 16:05 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.