inudex
No finding either wayWe watched this launch. It matches none of the patterns we record, and it does not meet every criterion for a record with no markers. Neither endorsed nor accused.
A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 4.3 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.
At launch
| Created | 2026-10-02 16:04 UTC |
| Creator | HBWhLRREycDwM44Vw3LvNfV6uquqNEbyihUmV7J65EpZ |
| Creator took | 4.0% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 611 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve: 39 within the first 30s, 5 bundled into the creation block. |
| Graduated | 13 min after launch |
| Curve, read on chain | Not re-read, deliberately: the pool is the confirmation. Migration empties a completed curve into its pool, so the pool's existence - recorded on this page - proves what the curve account would. Curve reads are spent where no pool answers. |
| Creator sold | yes |
| Recorded from | 5kCKYMPVg7Azt9mfe4jwF5… slot 452,658,677
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-10-02 16:04:04 UTC Slot 452,658,677, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | 5 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist. |
| Thirty seconds in | 39 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | 2026-10-02 16:16:54 UTC +12m 50s Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-10-02 16:16:54 UTC +12m 50s
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 2 launches from 2 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them → |
| This ticker | On 6 launches from 6 creator wallets, including this one. See them → |
| This document | Byte-identical to 1 other launch's metadata document. See them → |
| This creator | 20 earlier launches, 3 confirmed graduated on chain. See the creator's launches → |
| Birth artifacts | Launches by this creator share byte-identical artifacts with launches from 4 other creator wallets, across 9 shared artifacts, each matched by hash. The linkage sits in a component too large for this record to state as one group; the record states that exclusion. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
| Liquidity | 4.3 SOL |
| Read from chain | 2026-10-02 23:02 UTC, just now |
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | inudex |
| Description | inudex |
| Metadata held | sha256 b7fdf5c29f001db3299e840a816c77f0fa5baa97520fad5eeae62651901f4e79 · 300 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 4b0c59eeff4f2c5586b96d8f1ada8ca752b9961e2b1ad5e79275ea6d7b937c8e · 162,674 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-02 16:04 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.