3,682,059 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 16:48 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Brand Protection
The picture this launch published at birth

Launch record · observed at creation 2026-11-12 05:20 UTC

CUT

CUT WATER

FdDeUuNbEDiHdSbkY4zW9cw5ZmNDaDDKVwW3yN9Ppump Solscan pump.fun

What this launch shares with other launches

Free on this page: that each of these exists, and how many. The list behind a count, meaning which launches, which wallets and the transaction for each, opens with a free account for 5 lists, or with Brand Protection at $79 a month for every list on every record. Watch this creator wallet: a free account is emailed the next time it launches. This one launch can also be kept as a $49 document with its identical-file and creator lists, further down this page.

Its own first blocks

0.2%of supply taken by the creator in the first block
8outside wallets bought on the bonding curve
Noreached a graduation threshold while we watched
No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this creator has 1 other launch on record. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

noteThe creator sold while we were watching.

At launch

Created2026-11-12 05:20 UTC
CreatorCfKwi9fHhZX3xBPK4girLW8byBuk8xfkwh9MvrJDuHjU
Creator took0.2% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers8 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 9 within the first 30s, 0 in the very same block the token was created in.
Graduatednot while we were watching
Curve on chainNothing to confirm. This launch never reached a graduation threshold while we watched, so there was no completion to check against the curve account. Most tokens end this way, and it is not a finding about them.
Creator soldyes
Recorded from4N72AATKBjQfxtmghDQ4yE… slot 468,405,820
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recordedpeak_price - we decoded no price for this launch at all - the column holds what we SAW, and a launch we stopped following has a peak that stops with us.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Order of events

Created2026-11-12 05:20:28 UTC
Slot 468,405,820, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation blockNo wallet bought in the block the token was created in.
Thirty seconds in9 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureNo other launch we hold a picture for used this one.
This tickerOn 101 launches from 95 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.7% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →
This creator1 earlier launch, none of which reached a graduation threshold while we watched. Across the archive, 70.8% of launches come from a creator with more than one launch on record. See the creator's launches →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NameCUT WATER
DescriptionAI slop concept
Metadata heldsha256 6057c4ba179216659d507ae658dc0e93e04e6f356e70aadacefaf7b0ea957fc7 · 205 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 59fa328d3b69ffda1fb415da061a67a163f7cf2e3e7f39f38b03643892768a84 · 188,785 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-11-12 05:20 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another