1,308,162 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 21:03 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Pro

SS

No finding either wayWe watched this launch and ran the launch-record tests on it: what the creator took in the first block, how many wallets bought on the curve, how fast the curve filled, and whether a single buy completed it. None of them fired, and a marker is one of those tests firing. We still do not head this record 'no markers found': that line is kept for launches whose curve we watched fill slowly with at least thirty outside buyers, and this one did not complete a curve at all. Those tests read this launch's own first blocks only. What it shares with other launches is counted below and is not part of this answer. Neither endorsed nor accused.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 2 other launches from 3 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 44.8% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. The transaction it was decoded from is cited below: every figure here can be checked against the chain without trusting us. Not a prediction and not advice.

GvMX4RQJT5qQ6dyMc7cfmtoJjE2PfGdjhnJzR295pump Solscan pump.fun

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteOnly 3.2 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.

At launch

Created2026-10-03 15:51 UTC
CreatorAXxG4PMvKN5kMKuNyMkpKwSeMG8wGvJ2c9dZL6GP31Lk
Creator took1.7% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers454 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 77 within the first 30s, 5 in the very same block the token was created in - a block is one batch of transactions, so those buys and the creation were confirmed together.
Graduated15 min after launch
Curve on chainComplete. We read the bonding curve account 6.1 h ago and it was finished. Checked 2026-10-03 16:31 UTC.
Creator soldyes
Recorded from2CDoVR9ivARytCSpfo3xGD… slot 452,979,084
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.

Keep this launch as a document

A dated extract of this one launch, frozen at the moment you buy it: every other launch that carried the byte-identical picture or document, this creator's other launches, and what this register checked. A page you can send to someone, and a clean PDF from your browser's print dialogue.

No account needed; the link arrives by email and is permanent. It is this register's own output, with no signature and no attestation: the scoped, signed version written for a dispute is a provenance report. Everything on this page stays free.

Order of events

Created2026-10-03 15:51:19 UTC
Slot 452,979,084, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation block5 wallets bought in the block the token was created in, before anyone outside could have seen it exist.
Thirty seconds in77 distinct buyers, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.
Curve completed2026-10-03 16:06:12 UTC +14m 53s
Confirmed against the venue's own completion state.
Highest price seen2026-10-03 16:06:12 UTC +14m 53s
4.109e-7 SOL per token. Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureOn 3 launches from 3 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. See them →
This tickerOn 375 launches from 284 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. See this ticker's page →
This documentThe same launch document, byte for byte, as 1 other launch, across 2 creator wallets in all. See them →
Files shared with other walletsLaunches by this creator were made with files byte-identical to those of 2 other creator wallets, across 3 shared files, each matched by its sha256 fingerprint. Sharing a file establishes that the same file was used, never that the same person used it. Following those shared files outward reaches a group of 3 creator wallets in all. See the linked wallets →

Pool

Liquidity3.2 SOL
Read from chain2026-10-03 22:39 UTC, just now

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NameSuper Swordcat
DescriptionThe hero nobody expected
Metadata heldsha256 12a677b2efb4c960037f1b3e8b82a94a5796c4848594b6d0e6f69ec115beae4c · 331 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Picture heldsha256 a7782a5b1f81d782d84e2cce55e9a465afbb787c4f4539b0d8d9b63721a63efa · 637,819 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-03 15:51 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another