Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 33 other launches from 26 creator wallets in all, and this creator has 89 other launches on record. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.2% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.
At launch
| Created | 2026-10-31 22:22 UTC |
| Creator | 9bvjBWKUsLqaRsQndkZkwVK67aBFWjiKedgH3UT2gb7k |
| Creator took | 2.1% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 0 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 0 in the very same block the token was created in. |
| Graduated | not while we were watching |
| Curve on chain | Nothing to confirm. This launch never reached a graduation threshold while we watched, so there was no completion to check against the curve account. Most tokens end this way, and it is not a finding about them. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | 3U7c4CrMerif9W5Jg8H3FJ… slot 463,854,893
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us. |
| Not recorded | snap30_buyers - no thirty-second snapshot was taken, and that snapshot is meaningful only for an observed launch.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against
one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the
published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-10-31 22:22:12 UTC Slot 463,854,893, which is the chain's own clock for this moment. |
| Creation block | No wallet bought in the block the token was created in. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-10-31 22:22:20 UTC +8s
2.907e-8 SOL per token.
Decoded from an on-chain transaction that executed at that price.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 34 launches from 26 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.2% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them → |
| This ticker | On 363 launches from 273 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.5% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page → |
| This creator | 89 earlier launches. All 1 that reached the graduation threshold on our feed were read on chain, and none had completed. Across the archive, 70.6% of launches come from a creator with more than one launch on record. See the creator's launches → |
| Files shared with other wallets | Launches by this creator were made with files byte-identical to those of 14 other creator wallets, across 15 shared files, each matched by its sha256 fingerprint. Sharing a file establishes that the same file was used, never that the same person used it. Following those shared files outward reaches a group so large that this register stops being able to tell individual hands apart inside it, so it does not name the group or state a size. That limit is published with the method rather than left for a reader to discover. Across the archive, 63.9% of launches come from a creator linked to at least one other wallet this way. See the linked wallets → |
Pool
We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | Ghosti |
| Metadata held | sha256 c8008717326d42432fc613cc12b715287fa677c6c317a2c3cd9dd12edfab2716 · 347 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Picture held | sha256 2edece7b1e4f01a6c3ee2f2a6a13e9c3c0cc4524c228dcb117223f9e10a767f9 · 4,398 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-10-31 22:22 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.