Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 181 other launches from 163 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.2% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.
Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.
At launch
| Created | 2026-09-02 13:21 UTC |
| Creator | E8yn8tcuUQnkfDRAXkKv4bsqh2Jpxn7QfArBQsRrUMvu |
| Creator took | 79.3% of supply in the first block |
| Outside buyers | 0 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 0 within the first 30s, 0 in the very same block the token was created in. |
| Graduated | yes; we did not record when |
| Curve on chain | Complete. We read the bonding curve account 62.8 days ago and it was finished. Checked 2026-09-09 23:04 UTC. |
| Creator sold | not while we watched |
| Recorded from | Not recorded. This launch predates our keeping the creation transaction (2026-09-09), and its trade rows had been pruned by retention before the backfill could recover the signature from them. The figures above stand on our own observation alone, which is weaker than a citation, and we would rather say so than leave the gap unmarked. |
Order of events
| Created | 2026-09-02 13:21:09 UTC |
| Creation block | No wallet bought in the block the token was created in. |
| Highest price seen | 2026-09-02 13:21:09 UTC
4.109e-7 SOL per token.
Source not recorded, which is every row written before 2026-09-10 - never that the peak was
unsourced.
A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not
here. |
| Thirty seconds in | No buyer, within the first thirty seconds. A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so
it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened. |
| Curve completed | Recorded as complete; we did not record when.
Confirmed against the venue's own completion state. |
Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.
Seen before
| This picture | On 182 launches from 163 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.2% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them → |
| This ticker | On 535 launches from 496 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.5% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page → |
| This document | The same launch document, byte for byte, as 1 other launch, across 2 creator wallets in all. Across the archive, 33% of the launches whose document we hold carry one byte-identical to a different creator's. See them → |
| Files shared with other wallets | Launches by this creator were made with files byte-identical to those of 1 other creator wallet, across 2 shared files, each matched by its sha256 fingerprint. Sharing a file establishes that the same file was used, never that the same person used it. Following those shared files outward reaches a group of 2 creator wallets in all. Across the archive, 64% of launches come from a creator linked to at least one other wallet this way. See the linked wallets → |
Who took the curve
One transaction bought 85 SOL of this curve, in the same batch of events as the launch, from the creator's own wallet. The wallet and the transaction →
Our launch and trade timestamps are both taken when the events are decoded, so events that arrived together carry the same one. That it was taken at or near launch is on the record; how many seconds after is not.
Pool
We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.
What this launch claimed to be
| Name | wofi |
| Description | wofi (WOFI) |
| Metadata held | sha256 27dda305f102b6980b853b9ef9638e91a1cfacfc0d049df8d06ae5db76fa4b9b · 274 bytes Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree. |
| Document re-read | Byte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-23 01:08 UTC. |
| Picture held | sha256 d36d61df781febd29d4581bae17a8fdbda0b97e4a368ef35d9a8a8046e6167b8 · 112,582 bytes |
Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-10 20:30 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.