3,559,173 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 02:56 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Brand Protection
The picture this launch published at birth

Launch record · observed at creation 2026-09-10 18:42 UTC

ZENCAT

zencat

JAsVC8zXWFxJqiS4kNRzotxJfjwUrMaR5ZToY8WJpump Solscan pump.fun
79.3%of supply taken by the creator in the first block
Yesreached a graduation threshold while we watched
146launches carry this ticker, from 104 creator wallets
3other launches used this exact picture file
The creator took 79% of supply at launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 3 other launches from 4 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.4% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

findingThe creator bought its own bonding curve - 85 SOL, from the same wallet that created the token.
findingThe creator took 79.3% of the entire supply in the first block. Nothing visible on-chain today shows this - the float has since been spread across wallets.
noteThe creator sold while we were watching.
noteTook 1 bonding curve outright. 85 SOL spent on curves. It is not yet a net seller in our data (0 SOL in, 3 out).
noteOnly 0.1 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.

At launch

Created2026-09-10 18:42 UTC
Creator6QMWJhGLA2NcuqgUAiq3WBzoqGrH37zBqS8445vWb1ZV
Creator took79.3% of supply in the first block
Outside buyersunknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 0 within the first 30s, 0 in the very same block the token was created in.
Graduatedyes; we did not record when
Curve on chainNot re-read, deliberately: the pool is the confirmation. Migration empties a completed curve into its pool, so the pool's existence - recorded on this page - proves what the curve account would. Curve reads are spent where no pool answers.
Creator soldyes
Recorded from3s1EVkBjY3LE9b9to4LRoh… slot 445,954,845
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recordedcurve_buyers - its trade rows had already been sampled at finalize or pruned by retention before anything counted them, so any count over the survivors would be a floor rather than a measurement.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Order of events

Created2026-09-10 18:42:28 UTC
Slot 445,954,845, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation blockNo wallet bought in the block the token was created in.
Highest price seen2026-09-10 18:42:28 UTC
6.957e-6 SOL per token. Source not recorded, which is every row written before 2026-09-10 - never that the peak was unsourced. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.
Thirty seconds inNo buyer, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.
Curve completedRecorded as complete; we did not record when.
Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureOn 4 launches from 4 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.4% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them →
This tickerOn 146 launches from 104 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.6% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →

Who took the curve

One transaction bought 85 SOL of this curve, in the same batch of events as the launch, from the creator's own wallet. The wallet and the transaction →

That is the same transaction the token was created in: the launch and the purchase of its float are one signature.

Our launch and trade timestamps are both taken when the events are decoded, so events that arrived together carry the same one. That it was taken at or near launch is on the record; how many seconds after is not.

Pool

Liquidity0.1 SOL
Read from chain2026-11-13 06:08 UTC, just now

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
Namezencat
Metadata heldsha256 0758a0e6431e8831bbc7c9cfadc6b73bd47a172e7e213e5ec1671132e1aee5ab · 758 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Document re-readByte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-17 18:42 UTC.
Picture heldsha256 0416de219521ba5cdc7f882fc88088146cf2fea20cdc892de064c5314ef69ee2 · 96,597 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-10 18:42 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another