3,529,032 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 13:18 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Brand Protection
The picture this launch published at birth

Launch record · observed at creation 2026-09-10 17:43 UTC

POLLY

Pudgy Polly

boN3M2Ka1ZPA2v3cJ4dAbdLwUTtCqrKZFdUfHoUpump Solscan pump.fun
79.3%of supply taken by the creator in the first block
Yesreached a graduation threshold while we watched
76launches carry this ticker, from 62 creator wallets
5other launches used this exact picture file
The creator took 79% of supply at launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 5 other launches from 4 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 56.3% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

findingThe creator bought its own bonding curve - 85 SOL, from the same wallet that created the token.
findingThe creator took 79.3% of the entire supply in the first block. Nothing visible on-chain today shows this - the float has since been spread across wallets.
noteTook 1 bonding curve outright. 85 SOL spent on curves. We hold no market trades for it in either direction, so what it did with the tokens afterwards is not on our record.
noteOnly 0.3 SOL of liquidity was in the pool just now.

At launch

Created2026-09-10 17:43 UTC
Creator6LNsHZCdkW8Nh9JKjUhJ3mdDgqgFK5d7BBMM5f6fWy1t
Creator took79.3% of supply in the first block
Outside buyersunknown distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 0 within the first 30s, 0 in the very same block the token was created in.
Graduatedyes; we did not record when
Curve on chainNot re-read, deliberately: the pool is the confirmation. Migration empties a completed curve into its pool, so the pool's existence - recorded on this page - proves what the curve account would. Curve reads are spent where no pool answers.
Creator soldnot while we watched
Recorded from5QAikaVZBonqRUufkiapv7… slot 445,943,656
The transaction this record was decoded from. Every figure above is in it. Fetch it and check us.
Not recordedcurve_buyers - its trade rows had already been sampled at finalize or pruned by retention before anything counted them, so any count over the survivors would be a floor rather than a measurement.
Each is unknown rather than zero. An unknown never certifies a launch and never counts against one; it is the record declining to state something. The column names link to their full entries in the published schema, which is where the rest of the reason is written down.

Order of events

Created2026-09-10 17:43:22 UTC
Slot 445,943,656, which is the chain's own clock for this moment.
Creation blockNo wallet bought in the block the token was created in.
Thirty seconds inNo buyer, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.
Highest price seen2026-09-10 18:37:35 UTC +54m 12s
4.842e-5 SOL per token. Source not recorded, which is every row written before 2026-09-10 - never that the peak was unsourced. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.
Curve completedRecorded as complete; we did not record when.
Confirmed: a PumpSwap pool was found for it.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureOn 6 launches from 4 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 56.3% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them →
This tickerOn 76 launches from 62 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.5% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →
Files shared with other walletsLaunches by this creator were made with files byte-identical to those of 2 other creator wallets, across 2 shared files, each matched by its sha256 fingerprint. Sharing a file establishes that the same file was used, never that the same person used it. Following those shared files outward reaches a group so large that this register stops being able to tell individual hands apart inside it, so it does not name the group or state a size. That limit is published with the method rather than left for a reader to discover. Across the archive, 63.9% of launches come from a creator linked to at least one other wallet this way. See the linked wallets →

Who took the curve

One transaction bought 85 SOL of this curve, in the same batch of events as the launch, from the creator's own wallet. The wallet and the transaction →

That is the same transaction the token was created in: the launch and the purchase of its float are one signature.

Our launch and trade timestamps are both taken when the events are decoded, so events that arrived together carry the same one. That it was taken at or near launch is on the record; how many seconds after is not.

Pool

Liquidity0.3 SOL
Read from chain2026-11-12 19:19 UTC, just now

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NamePudgy Polly
DescriptionPudgy Polly was launched on StonkFun.
Metadata heldsha256 177e88f1d2aaae2548577fc395e05d1df5ec24abb3b84473d7c1c434938055c2 · 427 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Document re-readByte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-17 17:44 UTC.
Picture heldsha256 0890cd6d53ff7000dbb45eeb8732bae77270310571164c8df481219ed2eee478 · 12,628 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-10 17:43 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another