3,415,493 launches on record
Coverage from 2 Sep 2026
Archive read 06:58 UTC today
Token lookup · free
Live API · with a key
Lists behind counts · Brand Protection

STARLINK

The creator took 79% of supply at launchRead from the launch record. What it means is the reader's to decide; we record what happened, not why.

Also recorded, and not part of the finding above: this picture is on 23 other launches from 21 creator wallets in all. The finding reads this launch's own first blocks; these are about what it has in common with other launches. Both are counts, not findings. Across the archive, 55.9% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. They are listed under Seen before, further down this page.

A record of what this launch was at birth, read from the Solana chain. We did not record its creation transaction, so these figures rest on our observation at the time rather than on a citation you can follow. Not a prediction and not advice.

pCJBncx55i82VnzEZkQKsC1vx8XCgPuCgtm1ieCpump Solscan pump.fun

Cite this record as: Chain of Title, STARLINK (Starlink), mint pCJBncx55i82VnzEZkQKsC1vx8XCgPuCgtm1ieCpump, observed at creation 2026-09-02 15:56 UTC. Chain of Title, a register of Solana token launches recorded at creation. https://chainoftitle.org/t/pCJBncx55i82VnzEZkQKsC1vx8XCgPuCgtm1ieCpump

Each line below is one entry on this record. A finding is something we recorded that counts against the launch, a note is a weaker one, and not established means we could not settle the question either way - an absence, not a lesser warning.

findingThe creator took 79.3% of the entire supply in the first block. Nothing visible on-chain today shows this - the float has since been spread across wallets.

At launch

Created2026-09-02 15:56 UTC
Creator7XHdaphSg4AjYFHxKS78PyiFHyziaEFDBoPdG8AfWvAR
Creator took79.3% of supply in the first block
Outside buyers0 distinct wallets, not counting the creator, bought on the bonding curve - the automatic market a launch starts on, which has to fill up before the token can trade anywhere else: 0 within the first 30s, 0 in the very same block the token was created in.
Graduatedyes; we did not record when
Curve on chainComplete. We read the bonding curve account 61.4 days ago and it was finished. Checked 2026-09-09 23:04 UTC.
Creator soldnot while we watched
Recorded fromNot recorded. This launch predates our keeping the creation transaction (2026-09-09), and its trade rows had been pruned by retention before the backfill could recover the signature from them. The figures above stand on our own observation alone, which is weaker than a citation, and we would rather say so than leave the gap unmarked.

Keep this launch as a document

A dated extract of this one launch, frozen at the moment you buy it: every other launch that carried the byte-identical picture or document, this creator's other launches, and what this register checked. A page you can send to someone, and a clean PDF from your browser's print dialogue.

No account needed; the link arrives by email and is permanent. It is this register's own output, with no signature and no attestation: the scoped, signed version written for a dispute is a provenance report. Everything on this page stays free.

Several launches in one matter

A pack of 10 of these documents is $200, redeemed one launch at a time whenever you find the next one. You get a code by email; it does not expire.

Order of events

Created2026-09-02 15:56:49 UTC
Creation blockNo wallet bought in the block the token was created in.
Highest price seen2026-09-02 15:56:49 UTC
4.109e-7 SOL per token. Source not recorded, which is every row written before 2026-09-10 - never that the peak was unsourced. A peak only ratchets, so read it as a floor: it is what we saw, and a spike between observations is not here.
Thirty seconds inNo buyer, within the first thirty seconds.
A snapshot taken off a tick at the thirty-second mark, so it carries no moment of its own; it is placed here because that is where it happened.
Curve completedRecorded as complete; we did not record when.
Confirmed against the venue's own completion state.

Times are receipt times: the moment we decoded the event, not the block's own timestamp. Events that arrived in one batch carry one timestamp, so ordering within a batch is not established, and a second or two here is our latency rather than the chain's.

Seen before

This pictureOn 24 launches from 21 creator wallets, including this one. Identical bytes, matched by sha256: not a similar image, the same one. Across the archive, 55.9% of the launches whose picture we hold carry one a different creator also used. See them →
This tickerOn 487 launches from 308 creator wallets, including this one. Counted over the launches we watched at birth, the same basis as this ticker's own page, so the two cannot disagree. Across the launches we watched at birth that stated a ticker, 89.4% wear one that more than one creator wallet has launched. See this ticker's page →

Pool

We have no pool balance for this token that we can date, so none is quoted. That is a gap in our reading coverage and says nothing about the launch record above, which does not depend on it.

What this launch claimed to be

The picture this launch published at birth
NameStarlink
Descriptionast, affordable internet available all around the world. Engineered by @SpaceX
Metadata heldsha256 1855d08329ce8110c3e40cf4b373753a3d37a1820ea41c55f2860eed9aff146d · 455 bytes
Read the document, the bytes themselves rather than our reading of them. The hash above is what the record commits to, so anyone can check the two agree.
Document re-readByte-identical to the launch-time capture when re-read 2026-09-23 01:00 UTC.
Picture heldsha256 bc5519358a194f8ef3a9cf8508dceefecaf1898724ef1a27d80efab4a378615c · 12,241 bytes

Off-chain and mutable. This is what the launch served when we read it at 2026-09-10 21:55 UTC; the creator can change or unpin any of it at any time, and a launch record is the only place it survives.

Check another